media – Grey Panthers Savannah https://grey-panther.net Just another WordPress site Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:39:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 206299117 You go PHD Comics! https://grey-panther.net/2010/01/you-go-phd-comics.html https://grey-panther.net/2010/01/you-go-phd-comics.html#respond Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:39:00 +0000 https://grey-panther.net/?p=132 PHD Comics is always great and hilarious (and worth to subscribe to if you are even vaguely related to the academic world – like trough a friend of a friend :-)) but there are those occasions when it is epic, like this one:

The media can almost never be trusted to get things right and we should get into the habit of questioning everything they deliver. Think for yourself people, get a grip on basic math and logic and learn how to dig up information!

PS. I’m not “new media”, I’m just a raindrop :-p.

]]>
https://grey-panther.net/2010/01/you-go-phd-comics.html/feed 0 132
The myth of the cognitive quantum jumps https://grey-panther.net/2009/08/the-myth-of-the-cognitive-quantum-jumps.html https://grey-panther.net/2009/08/the-myth-of-the-cognitive-quantum-jumps.html#comments Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:08:00 +0000 https://grey-panther.net/?p=224 Update: see this presentation given by Scott Berkun at Google, which which explains my points much more eloquently.

2362129522_c3ce6282e5_b Very often media (and I’m using the word “media” here in its most comprehensive way – including things like blogs, Slashdot, etc) tells us the story of some uber-hyper-mega-cool new-unseen-until-now method of performing X. This leads many people to believe that progress is done in “quantum leaps” – ie. there are no intermediate steps between point A (where we are now) and point B (where we can get using this new discovery). As a side-effect, it also makes people think that all they have to do is to come up with a “big idea”.

This is utter nonsense and I would like to ask everybody to stop propagating this myth! (Of course I know that it is wishful thinking on my part to think that this blogpost would have a large impact on humanity, but hey, at least I’ve vented my frustration, and if just one person is convinced, I’m happy).

There are at least two factors which mislead people into this fallacy: first, the lack of knowledge of the reader in a particular field. So, there is no chance for the reader to evaluate what works the current one is based upon, unless this is explicitly mentioned by the author. And here is the second problem: our tendency to over-emphasize (either intentionally or unintentionally) our contribution.

Also, there are a lot of both empirical and scientific evidence for the fact that progress is not as simple as coming up with one great-idea. The quote from Thomas Edison (“Genius is 1 percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration”) illustrates this. A more scientific study comes from Malcolm Gladwell, who says that you need about 10 000 hours (about ten years) of deliberate practice to become great in a given field.

One example which comes to mind from the field of malware-research is the case of the Storm worm. When it “appeared”, there was a big media frenzy around it, fueled mainly by the AV companies. What nobody mentioned (because it would have broken the myth of “new, ultra-dangerous malware materializing from nowhere”) is that “Storm” is in fact the “normal” evolution of a much older malware family detected by many as “Tibs”. If one would to place the samples on a timeline and study them in the order as they appeared, one could clearly see how the different methods (like using a simple encryption layer over UPX, using different API calls to thwart emulators, using MMX/SSE instructions, using the return values of the API calls in the decoding process, etc) appeared and evolved. In fact “Tibs” and “Storm” are very clearly the work of the same group of people, and not something new as the reports would like you to believe.

No quantum leaps (except in theoretical physics :-))!

Picture taken from renrut’s photostream with permission.

]]>
https://grey-panther.net/2009/08/the-myth-of-the-cognitive-quantum-jumps.html/feed 2 224
FORA.tv https://grey-panther.net/2009/08/fora-tv.html https://grey-panther.net/2009/08/fora-tv.html#respond Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:10:00 +0000 https://grey-panther.net/?p=229 foratv I discovered FORA.tv just recently, but I’m already a huge fan. If you like TV channels like Discovery or National Geographic, you will certainly find something of interest here.

What’s great:

  • it’s free with very little and unobtrusive advertisement
  • the programs are professionally recorded / postprocessed (no volume-to-low-to-hear problems here)
  • link to individual parts of the program
  • a lot of supporting materials (like transcripts) and even audio and video downloads!
  • possibility to embed the videos on other sites like blogs
  • recommendations (“related programs”) which are pretty much spot-on (or maybe I’m just a video-junky :-))

Much of the functionality is available to non-registered users, and if you want to register, it is a quick and painless. A minor problem is that the links in their RSS feeds is sometimes wrong, but this is rare and looks like user error, and as such it is rather easy to guess the correct URL (like putting one “r” instead of two).

Just to get you started, here are two episodes about Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman of Mythbusters fame:

MythBuster Adam Savage’s Colossal Failures

MythBusters: Just the Facts

You can also check out their blog for some behind-the-scenes look.

Enjoy!

Disclaimer: I have no other relationship with FORA.tv, other than being a satisfied and enthusiastic user.

]]>
https://grey-panther.net/2009/08/fora-tv.html/feed 0 229